Category Archives: Technology

A 2nd Huawei executive has been arrested — this time in Poland on suspicion of spying for the Chinese government - An executive at the Chinese tech giant Huawei was arrested in Poland on suspicion of spying on behalf of the Chinese government, according to multiple reports. This is the second high-profile arrest …

Tweeted by @envirosec

Christian Reib on LinkedIn: “I’m hiring! Cyber Security Account Executive (Artificial intelligence) – We are looking for Sales talents with a Bachelor’! Intelligent, brilliant, ambitious Danish or Swedish native speakers with a Bachelor Degree, located in Copenhagen or Malmö -area. Our client Darktrace, the world’s leading AI company for cyber security – (Artificial intelligence, also called machine intelligence -the “new black”) is currently expanding its sales organization in Denmark to accommodate a rapidly-growing customer base and accelerating revenue. This position offers fast-paced career development, and numerous opportunities for personal achievement and significant commission-earning potential. Join us a our new office in Copenhagen and be a part of our training program, events and Kick off’s in London.. Find more info and apply for the job by using this link: #sales #software #job #cyber #saas #Trainee #cloudsecurity #AI #artificialintelligence #salgsjobs #jobs “ - I'm hiring! Cyber Security Account Executive (Artificial intelligence) - We are looking for Sales talents with a Bachelor'! Intelligent, brilliant, ambitious Danish or Swedish native speakers with a …

Tweeted by @cr_Saleshunter

Cyber Warfare, by HANROW - For as long as man has existed, the pursuit of technological advancement has powered us as a race. We thrive on creating newer and easier ways to simplify our everyday lives. The internet has become …

Tweeted by @montanarealtyc1

The war for encrypted data - This week marked the 11th annual Data Privacy Day initiative and TechRadar Pro is helping to improve data protection awareness with a series of articles exploring data privacy and how it impacts cons…

Tweeted by @BIICSCyber

Popular | JD Supra - JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations. This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC (…

Tweeted by @JDSupra

Major Android ad fraud scam campaign drains battery & eats data

By Waqas

Presence of infected games and apps that are costing innocent users financial and data losses is not a new phenomenon. However, it is indeed surprising that a firm that promises to fight app piracy is itself involved in this horrendous act.   According to the latest research from Oracle, there is a new ad fraud […]

This is a post from Read the original post: Major Android ad fraud scam campaign drains battery & eats data

ESET shows at the Mobile World Congress the role of Artificial intelligence to create a world more safe-cyber – GlobalMedia IT USA & Caribbean - The company will also explain in the Congress, to be held in Barcelona from February 25, the latest threats in Android against the sector Financial and the risks of intelligent buildings. ESET, the l…

Tweeted by @GlobalMediaIT

The Cyber War Against Tibet - Cisco Talos, a group of world-class researchers, analysts, and engineers, recently uncovered a new cyberespionage campaign delivering a malicious Microsoft PowerPoint document using a mailing list ru…

Tweeted by @ChinaMonitoring

Samsung Announces the Galaxy Fold, a Phone That Opens Into a Tablet

At an event today, Samsung unveiled its foldable smartphone. It's called the Galaxy Fold, and it sports dual screens: one that folds in half like a notebook, and another that works just like any other. From a report: The roughly 200-gram Galaxy Fold flips open in portrait orientation, and the inside is coated with a film that gives it a photopaper-like appearance. It's got a protective polymer consisting of a cover window, a shock-absorbent film, and a polarizer that's 45 percent slimmer than the company's previous thinnest, along with a flexible layer and backplane. Samsung says the tech -- dubbed Infinity Flex Display -- took seven years to develop. Thanks to a highly durable adhesive, the Fold's 7.3-inch primary screen and "sophisticated" hinge system with interlocking gears can undergo "hundreds of thousands" of flexes without sustaining damage, Samsung says. The 4.6-inch secondary screen doesn't bend, and that's by design -- it puts apps at your fingertips when the Fold's folded in half. [...] It's available in both an LTE and 5G version, starting at an eye-popping $1,980. April 26 is the launch date.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

The NHS: A cyber-warfare playground - The NHS: A cyber-warfare playground Healthcare, & specifically the NHS, is a cyber-warfare target. Delayed patient referrals, investigations, & interventions can lead to anything up to death. More ma…

Tweeted by @Saif_Abed

Fancy Bear – Wikipedia - Fancy Bear's targets have included Eastern European governments and militaries, the country of Georgia and the Caucasus, Ukraine,[20] security-related organizations such as NATO, as well as US defens…

Tweeted by @RaymondFrenken

Qualcomm introduces the Snapdragon X55, a 7Gbps 5G modem

Qualcomm launches the 5G Snapdragon X55 modem with speeds up to 7Gbps

Two years after Qualcomm introduced Snapdragon X50, the company’s first-generation modem with 5G connectivity, the chipmaker has now unveiled the Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 – its 7Gbps 5G modem.

“Qualcomm Technologies is spearheading the first wave of 5G launches with our first generation 5G mobile platform. With significant evolution in capabilities and performance, our second generation commercial 5G modem is a true testament to the maturity and leadership of our 5G technology. We expect our 5G platform to accelerate 5G commercial momentum and power virtually all 5G launches in 2019 while significantly expanding the global 5G rollout footprint,” said Cristiano Amon, president of Qualcomm Incorporated.

The Snapdragon X55 is the world’s first 7 gigabits per second (Gbps) 5G modem and a successor to the world’s first 5G modem, the Snapdragon X50. The new modem can achieve download speeds up to 7 Gbps on the 5G network and upload speed up to 3 Gbps. It also supports 5G New Radio (NR) mmWave (high-bandwidth) and sub-6GHz (better coverage) spectrum bands. Further, it is a fully integrated modem, which is capable of supporting all existing network technologies such as 2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G.

Another advantage of the Snapdragon X55 is that it allows the spectrum of 4G and 5G signals to be shared, which is very important during the transition period. It will use Qualcomm’s second-generation antennas, which are less than 8mm thick.

Further, the Snapdragon X55 supports the Category 22 LTE standard in 4G network. This allows it to achieve maximum download speeds up to 2.5Gbps, and upload up to 316Mbps on the 4G network. The Snapdragon X55 also features Full Dimensional MIMO (FD-MIMO) for LTE.

Developed with a 7nm process, the new modem is compatible with FDD, TDD, SA (standalone) and NSA (non-standalone) networks in the 5G spectrum. While the Snapdragon X55 is suitable for all types of mobile devices, it is also compatible with connected PCs, laptops, tablets, fixed wireless access points, extended reality devices, and automotive applications.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 modem is expected to be available to customers by the end of the year.

Source: Qualcomm

The post Qualcomm introduces the Snapdragon X55, a 7Gbps 5G modem appeared first on TechWorm.

SN 702: Authenticity on the Internet

  • Last week's doozy of a patch Tuesday for both Microsoft and Adobe
  • An interesting twist coming to Windows 7 and Server 2008 security updates
  • Eight mining apps pulled from the Windows Store
  • Another positive security initiative from Google
  • Electric scooters being hacked
  • Chipping away at Tor's privacy guarantees
  • A year and a half after Equifax, and where's the data?
  • The beginnings of GDPR-like legislation for US
  • An extremely concerning new and emerging threat for the Internet

We invite you to read our show notes.

Hosts: Steve Gibson and Leo Laporte

Download or subscribe to this show at

You can submit a question to Security Now! at the GRC Feedback Page.

For 16kbps versions, transcripts, and notes (including fixes), visit Steve's site:, also the home of the best disk maintenance and recovery utility ever written Spinrite 6.


Establishing Whether Your Business Needs a Mobile Cobot

Experts say that mobile collaborative robots will be more effective compared to standard collaborative cobots. Mobile cobots, currently being touted as the next big thing in the world of collaborative robotics are already in the market.

Some businesses have already incorporated them in their operations. However, it is important to establish whether mobile cobots are appropriate for your business. Investing in a mobile cobot without a clear strategy on how it will enhance your processes is not a good idea. Below is how to determine whether your business needs them.

A primary mobile cobot comes with a collaborative robot manipulator fixed at the mobile autonomous base. It offers all the benefits of the two technologies complete with extra advantages of mobile manipulation.

While some of the benefits of mobile collaborative robots may seem promising, it’s important to understand whether they are ideal for your specific situation. Entrepreneurs should ask themselves; will mobility enhance the performance of your industrial robots for your specific operations?

While there are cheaper solutions to implement for the same benefits that mobile cobots offer, some applications can be highly enhanced by giving your robot more mobility.

What are some of the Situations that can gain from more Mobility?

Below are situations where a mobile collaborative robot can outdo a standard industrial robot.

  • A Variety of Small Automation Tasks

Collaborative robots come with added agility, making them reuse for new tasks. This enables operators to navigate cobots between multiple tasks daily. However, transferring the cobot requires human input. Do you navigate your robot between numerous tasks every day? Probably you should consider adopting a mobile base.  

  • Small Batch Sizes

What batch sizes does your robot process? If it processes large batches, it is probable that a single task will take up the entire day. If this is your situation, then a mobile base will not be a valuable investment for your business. If your robot processes small batches regularly, it is an indication that it changes between tasks frequently. In such a situation, your business could benefit from adopting a mobile robot.

  • Pick, Place, and Transport

Pick and place tasks are some of the most popular for cobots. Collaborative robots are utilized for picking items from one place and placing them in another place in preparation for transportation. A mobile collaborative robot could come in handy if your drop off area is far from the pickup area.

  • Large Workspaces

Large workspaces are common in the logistics industry, which is also a big robotic adoption driver. Currently, there are various mobile cobots that are specially designed to cater for logistics applications. If your robot executes tasks within large areas, you should consider enhancing its mobility

  • Entirely Automated Workflow

Many cobot operators want to combine their manual tasks executed by human workers with robotic tasks. Collaborative robots are structured operate with humans in the same workspace. You may want to change an entire process to collaborative robot automation.

To accomplish an entirely automated workflow, you should automate the transportation of products from one workstation to the other, and your business can benefit from adopting a mobile base.

Evaluating Your Application for a Mobile Collaborative Robot

Do you think a mobile cobot will help your business scale? The following guidelines will help you establish how appropriate a mobile cobot is for your workplace.

  • Write Down the Number of Tasks the Cobot Could Execute

Mobility is more effective if a robot navigates between various tasks. Write down all the tasks within your workspace that the cobot would handle.  

  • Analyze Every Task to Establish Cobot Appropriateness

Not every task is appropriate for collaborative robots. Entrepreneurs should analyze each task to determine whether they could be completed using a cobot.

  • Establish How Long Switchover Takes

Collaborative robots cut down the time required to switchover between tasks. Find out how long your cobot takes to change from one task to the other. Consider the time that the robot stays stationary after completing one task. If switchovers are prolonged, then you may want to consider adding a mobile base to your cobot.


Before investing in a mobile cobot, you need to exhaust all the available options for enhancing the performance of your existing collaborative robot. Mobile cobots will soon become popular within the workspace. However, you need to ensure they are suitable for your specific tasks.

The post Establishing Whether Your Business Needs a Mobile Cobot appeared first on TechWorm.

Britain says total Huawei ban not needed as founder calls daughter’s arrest ‘politically motivated’ - British intelligence officials are saying a total ban on Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.’s equipment isn’t necessary, dealing a blow to U.S. efforts to rein in the Chinese telecom giant and possibly aff…

Tweeted by @christinedobby

Internet Under Attack in Russia - The Google app logo is seen on a smartphone in this picture illustration taken September 15, 2017. An acquaintance living in the United States asked me if it was true that Russia is about to “cut off…

Tweeted by @zafarwestern

Security Awareness Training - Create a cyber security awareness training program developed by the world’s leading experts. Get support, connect with community, and change behavior. Our Guided Training team will help you every ste…

Tweeted by @virtriv

Most & least radiation emitting smartphones in 2019

By Zehra Ali

Smartphones are a utility in our lives more than any other thing. The addiction has increased to a level that most of us keep our smartphones by our side whether we are at the office, home or even while we are on the bed. According to the research by Cellular Telecommunication and Internet Association, there […]

This is a post from Read the original post: Most & least radiation emitting smartphones in 2019

Monitoring Cyber Security Through Open Source Threat Intelligence – SimpleWAN – All-In-One SD-WAN, Network Router & Analytics, Cyber Security, Managed WiFi - The constant requirement for up-to-date cyber security information is driven by threats that change by the hour, and sometimes by the minute. Enterprises are increasingly investing in proactive threa…

Tweeted by @SimpleWAN_inc

Cyberattaques: « Pouvoir défendre les actifs d’une entreprise, sa capacité à résister, est un vrai métier », Michel Cazenave – 16/02 - Avec: Michel Cazenave, président de CIX-A. - 01 Business Forum - L’hebdo, du 9 février 2019, présenté par Frédéric Simottel, sur BFM Business. L’émission qui accompagne les entreprises dans leur tran…

Tweeted by @01BusinessForum

Australia has a challenge of scaling defence capabilities for large cyber attacks – Money Health Finance - Australian Defence Force (ADF) Head of Information Warfare Major General Marcus Thompson is concerned that while the nation has “good” defence capabilities, those capabilities might not be able to sc…

Tweeted by @MoneyhealthF

Bing - AMP pages seen in this viewer are created by third-party webmaster and are cached in Bing AMP Cache. You can click the link icon to get the third party webmaster full page url

Tweeted by @patriot14574

House Bill Requires Pornography Filter on All Phones, Computers Purchased in Kansas

Two bills introduced in the Kansas House on Wednesday generate funding for human trafficking programs by requiring all new internet-capable telephones or computers sold in the state to feature anti-pornography software and by mandating adult entertainment businesses charge a special admissions tax. From a report: Sabetha Rep. Randy Garber sponsored legislation requiring the software installations and dictating purchasers would have to pay a $20 fee to the state, and whatever cost was assessed by retail stores, to remove filters for "obscene" material. No one under 18 would be allowed to have filter software deleted. "It's to protect children," Garber, a Republican, said in an interview. "What it would do is any X-rated pornography stuff would be filtered. It would be on all purchases going forward. Why wouldn't anybody like this?" He said it wouldn't be surprising if the bill, if adopted as law, generated legal challenges.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Cybersecurity: Protecting Critical Infrastructures from Cyber Attack and Cyber Warfare (Zones of Religion) – CyberWar - The World Economic Forum regards the threat of cyber attack as one of the top five global risks confronting nations of the world today. Cyber attacks are increasingly targeting the core functions of …

Tweeted by @Khattiy74899201

Jim Angleton on LinkedIn: “Cyber Attacks at an all time high this weekend. #AegisFS #CyberThreat #Intelligence warning clients to maintain cybersecurity protocols otherwise risk being attacked with #Leach #Malware. first in US to Report.” - Cyber Attacks at an all time high this weekend. #AegisFS #CyberThreat #Intelligence warning clients to maintain cybersecurity protocols otherwise risk being attacked with #Leach #Malware. Aegisfinser…

Tweeted by @AegisFS

Slate’s Use of Your Data - By clicking “Agree,” you consent to Slate’s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy and the use of technologies such as cookies by Slate and our partners to deliver relevant advertising on our site, in e…

Tweeted by @stupid_hat

Website uses Artificial Intelligence to create utterly realistic human faces

By Waqas

A new way for cybercriminals to create fake social media profiles and carry identity scams using Artificial Intelligence powered tool? A couple of months ago it was reported that NVIDIA has developed a tool that uses Artificial Intelligence to create extremely realistic human faces which in reality do not exist. Now, there is a website that […]

This is a post from Read the original post: Website uses Artificial Intelligence to create utterly realistic human faces

(Video) What is Security Intelligence and How can an SME Use it? – SME Security Framework Blog – an R & I ICT Consulting Site - Hello. My name is Roger and today I’d like to talk to you about What is security intelligence and how can a Small Medium Enterprise use it to their benefit. Security Intelligence makes you are actual…

Tweeted by @smesecurity

Jan Geirnaert 🇧🇪 on LinkedIn: “Cyber Crime dominates the Motivations Behind Attacks chart, soaring to 88.1% from 79.2% in December 2018. The nine points have been likely taken from Cyber Espionage, dropped to 7.1% from 16%. Cyber Warfare hit 4% from 1.6%, while Hacktivism gets a tiny 0.8%, from 2.6%.” - Cyber Crime dominates the Motivations Behind Attacks chart, soaring to 88.1% from 79.2% in December 2018. The nine points have been likely taken from Cyber Espionage, dropped to 7.1% from 16%. Cyber …

Tweeted by @jangeirnaert

The Most In-Demand Jobs of 2019 - Make 2019 the year you set yourself a new career goal, learn new skills, and change your life. To give you some ideas on where you should focus your efforts, we’ve profiled some of the hottest tech c…


Amazon Pullout Shows What Anti-Capitalist Organizing and Leftist Politicians Can Do

NEW YORK, NY - NOVEMBER 26: People opposed to Amazon's plan to locate a headquarters in New York City hold a protest in Court House Square on November 26, 2018 in the Long Island City neighborhood of the Queens borough of New York City. Amazon recently named Long Island City as one of two locations that will house Amazon's second North American headquarters, known as HQ2.  (Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)

People opposed to Amazon’s plan to locate a headquarters in New York City hold a protest in Court House Square on Nov. 26, 2018 in the Long Island City neighborhood of the Queens borough of New York City.

Photo: Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

When Amazon, the monopsonistic retailer and ICE collaborator, announced last November that it would open its “second headquarters” in New York City, local resistance arose immediately. The day following the announcement, over 100 community activists, union leaders, and local politicians rallied in the Queens, New York, neighborhood of Long Island City — where Amazon planned to build – in opposition to the deal, which included $3 billion worth of government kickbacks.

Yet while resistance to Amazon’s HQ2 was swift and formidable, the task of stopping the deal appeared Sisyphean. So when Amazon announced on Thursday that it was canceling plans for the New York corporate campus, the news was met with delight and surprise. Amazon’s owner, Jeff Bezos, is the richest man in history; Gov. Andrew Cuomo promised the company that he’d change his name to “Amazon Cuomo” were the deal to go through. It is rare to win against a corporate-government power nexus of this magnitude.

The plan’s thwarting offers a lesson in the possibility of forceful collective struggle against seemingly unbeatable Goliaths. It also proves the need for left-wing politicians and organizers to challenge and replace conservative, capitalist Democrats if we are to wrest control of neighborhoods, cities, and public resources away from corporate interests and towards the good of existing communities.

In its statement announcing the plan’s cancellation, Amazon was explicit that its decision was in response to strong opposition from certain lawmakers. “A number of state and local politicians have made it clear that they oppose our presence and will not work with us to build the type of relationships that are required to go forward,’’ the company stated.

New York legislatures of old showed no sensitivity to anti-gentrification and anti-corporate sentiment.

It’s true that these politicians played a crucial role. Yet without consistent pressure and door-to-door canvassing from activist and community groups — including immigrant and worker advocate organizations Make the Road NY and Desis Rising Up and Moving, alongside Teamsters and Queens residents — many elected officials would not have taken up a stance against Amazon. New York legislatures of old showed no such sensitivity to anti-gentrification and anti-corporate sentiment.

“Let’s be clear who deserves the credit for this victory against Amazon — the working people of NYC who refused to let another company reap billions in corporate welfare at the expense of the City’s social welfare,” wrote New York City Council Member Carlos Menchaca, a longtime opponent to the Amazon deal, on Twitter. Citing his opposition to the retail giant’s anti-union policies and partnership with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Menchaca added, “New York City cannot claim to be a sanctuary city if it gives taxpayer money to fund systems that spy, threaten, and deport our immigrant neighbors.”

Menchaca’s praise for working people is apt: Political pressure from local organizers, activists, and community groups informed those lawmakers and, indeed, helped elect the new cadre of left-wing Democrats willing to take such a stance.

Some of the most vocal New York legislators who opposed HQ2 were newly elected through grassroots campaigns on democratic socialist platforms. House Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and state Sen. Julia Salazar are perhaps the most famous among them. As the New York Times reported earlier this week, last year’s elections also “paved the way for the nomination of [state] Senator Michael Gianaris — now a prominent Amazon opponent — to a state board with veto power over the deal.” The nomination reportedly spooked the corporate leviathan.

The victory against Amazon — and its dealmaker allies in New York’s leadership — shows the immediate material effects of upsetting the state and city’s historically centrist and corporate-friendly order, as represented by the governor and the mayor. Ocasio-Cortez tweeted, “Anything is possible: today was the day a group of dedicated, everyday New Yorkers & their neighbors defeated Amazon’s corporate greed, its worker exploitation, and the power of the richest man in the world.”

Amazon and its defenders are attempting to frame the deal’s cancellation as a coup by politicians acting against the will of New Yorkers. “Polls show that 70 percent of New Yorkers support our plans and investment,” the company statement read.

The idea that those non-unionized, predominantly six-figure jobs would have gone to local working-class people is laughable.

It is true that recent polls showed support for the project, especially among African-American and Latinx residents. But such polls do not account for the fact that Amazon’s promises to bring 25,000-plus “good” jobs and vast investment are poison pills. If Amazon’s original HQ in Seattle is anything to go by, the idea that those non-unionized, predominantly six-figure jobs would go to local working-class people is laughable. Meanwhile, HQ2 threatened to drive up already soaring property and retail prices in the area. And, as Ocasio-Cortez noted in response to criticism, “we were subsidizing those jobs” — with the $3 billion in tax breaks and other kickbacks for Amazon, a company that will pay nothing in federal taxes on $11.2 billion of profits made last year.

It hardly speaks to the democratic will of the people when polls frame corporate sweetheart deals and inequality generators as simple job creators. In this sense, Amazon’s claim to local popularity is about as legitimate as the misleading Brexit campaign’s claim to represent the general will among Britons.

Matt Stoller, an economist with the Open Markets Institute and critic of Amazon’s market control, noted how disingenuous it was for the company to claim such popularity. “If the question were framed differently the deal would be a lot less popular,” he wrote on Twitter. “For instance, ‘Would you personally pay $375 for each member of your family to Jeff Bezos so he would bring Amazon jobs to New York City?’” — referring to the fact that $3 billion of public money amounts to approximately $375 per New York City resident. Stoller added that while, of course, tax incentives don’t work that way, his alternative framing is no more misleading that the polling Amazon touted as proof of popularity: “Saying ‘would you accept great jobs in return for vague-sounding state and city incentives of up to $3 billion’ is going to get a high approval. ‘would you pay $375 to a billionaire for traffic jams and higher rent’ is not. This was not a popular deal.”

It is to the great credit of longtime community organizers — all too familiar with the empty, unfulfilled promises New York real estate developers — that an informed anti-gentrification politics won the day.

While the cancellation of HQ2 is a huge victory in and of itself, it also signals a welcome shift in political power away from the conservative Democrat status quo, and gives hope for further challenges to the corporate stranglehold on city development and resource allotment. The attorney and former candidate for attorney general, Zephyr Teachout, tweeted Thursday, “Oh, we are just beginning! Now let’s get a Congressional hearing on Amazon, labor, ICE, monopsony, how and why to break up Amazon.”

Checks on corporate hegemony and obscene inequality do not happen without pushing the Democratic Party to the left. When the Amazon deal was announced last year, Mayor Bill de Blasio remarked, “One of the biggest companies on earth next to the largest public housing unit in the country — the synergy is going to be extraordinary.” It is a welcome and overdue moment when a politician who utters such tone deaf, neoliberal paeans can no longer pass as progressive.

The post Amazon Pullout Shows What Anti-Capitalist Organizing and Leftist Politicians Can Do appeared first on The Intercept.

L’Iran, laboratoire de la cyberguerre - Chaque vendredi, chronique des jeux de pouvoir et de l’art de la guerre dans le cyberespace. Quiconque pénètre dans l’enceinte de l’ambassade de France à Téhéran doit déposer ses téléphones portables…

Tweeted by @godfroykone

Jan Geirnaert 🇧🇪 on LinkedIn: “Two U.S. Senators have expressed concerns that federal government employees may be jeopardising the nation’s security by using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) made by foreign companies, William Chalk takes up this tale of cyber espionage. # #surveillance #privacy #vpn #cyberespionage #espionage #cyberwarfare #cryptenstein #cyberterrorism #countercyberterrorism “ - Two U.S. Senators have expressed concerns that federal government employees may be jeopardising the nation’s security by using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) made by foreign companies, William Chalk…

Tweeted by @jangeirnaert

Amazon’s Home Surveillance Chief Declared War on “Dirtbag Criminals” as Company Got Closer to Police

On March 17, 2016, Ring CEO Jamie Siminoff emailed out a company-wide declaration of war. The message, under the subject line “Going to war,” made two things clear to the home surveillance company’s hundreds of employees: Everyone was getting free camouflage-print T-shirts (“They look awesome,” assured Siminoff), and the company’s new mission was to use consumer electronics to fight crime. “We are going to war with anyone that wants to harm a neighborhood,” Siminoff wrote — and indeed Ring made it easier for police and worried neighbors to get their hands on footage from Ring home cameras. Internal documents and video reviewed by The Intercept show why this merging of private Silicon Valley business and public law enforcement has troubling privacy implications.

This first declaration of startup militancy — which Siminoff would later refer to as “Ring War I” or simply “RW1” — would be followed by more, equally clumsy attempts at corporate galvanization, some aimed at competitors or lackluster customer support. But the RW1 email is striking in how baldly it lays out the priorities and values of Ring, a company now owned by Amazon and facing strident criticism over its mishandling of customer data, as previously reported by The Intercept and The Information.

Ring and Siminoff, who still leads the company, haven’t been shy about their focus on crime-fighting. In fact, Ring’s emphasis not only on personal peace of mind, but also active crime-fighting has been instrumental in differentiating its cloud-connected doorbell and household surveillance gear from those made by its competitors. Ring products come with access to a social app called Neighbors that allows customers to not just to keep tabs on their own property, but also to share information about suspicious-looking individuals and alleged criminality with the rest of the block. In other words, Ring’s cameras aren’t just for keeping tabs on your own stoop or garage — they work to create a private-sector security bubble around entire residential areas, a neighborhood watch for the era of the so-called smart home.

“Dirtbag criminals that steal our packages … your time is numbered.”

Forming decentralized 19th-century vigilance committees with 21st-century technology has been a toxic move, as shown by apps like Citizen, which encourages users to go out and personally document reported 911 calls, and Nextdoor, which tends to foster lively discussions about nonwhite people strolling through various suburbs. But Ring stands alone as a tech company for which hyperconnected vigilance isn’t just a byproduct, but the product itself — an avowed attempt to merge 24/7 video, ubiquitous computer sensors, and facial recognition, and deliver it to local police on a platter. It’s no surprise then that police departments from Bradenton, Florida, to Los Angeles have leapt to “partner” with Ring. Research showing that Ring’s claims of criminal deterrence are at the very least overblown don’t seem to have hampered sales or police enthusiasm for such partnerships.

But what does it mean when a wholly owned Amazon subsidiary teams up with local law enforcement? What kind of new creature is this, and what does it mean to live in its shadow? In a recent overview of Ring’s privacy risks, the Washington Post’s Geoffrey Fowler asked the company about its data-sharing relationship with police and was told, “Our customers are in control of who views their footage. Period. We do not have any plans to change this.” Fowler wrote: “But would Ring draw an ethical line at sharing footage directly with police, even if there was consent? It wouldn’t say.” The answer is that no such line, ethical or otherwise, exists.

A Ring video that appears to have been produced for police reveals that the company has gone out of its way to build a bespoke portal for law enforcement officers who want access to the enormous volume of residential surveillance footage generated by customers’ cameras.

The site, known as the Ring Neighborhoods Portal, is described in the video as a “community crime-fighting tool for law enforcement,” providing police with “all the crime-related neighborhood alerts that are posted within their jurisdiction, in real time.” Ring also allows police to monitor postings by users in the Neighbors app that are categorized as crime-related “neighborhood alerts” and to see the group conversations around those postings — a feature left unmentioned in Ring’s public descriptions of the software. “It’s like having thousands of eyes and ears on the street,” said the video. A Ring spokesperson clarified that police are not given the real names of users chatting through the Neighbors app.

Not only does this portal allow police to view Ring customers on a handy, Google-powered map, but it also makes requesting customer surveillance video a matter of several clicks. “Here, you can enter an address and time frame of interest and see a map of active cameras in your chosen area and time,” the narrator of the video said. Police can select the homes they’re interested in, and Ring takes it from there, creating an auto-generated form letter that prompts users to provide access to their footage. “No more going door to door to look for cameras and asking for footage,” the video said. A Ring spokesperson told The Intercept “When using the Neighbors portal, law enforcement officials see the same interface that all users see: the content is the same, the locations of posts are obfuscated, and no personal information is shared.” It’s unclear how placing Ring owners on a map is considered an obfuscation of their locations.

“Consent here is a smokescreen.”

Although Ring owners must opt in to the Neighbors program and appear free to deny law enforcement access to the cameras they own, the mere ability to ask introduces privacy and civil liberties quandaries that haven’t previously existed. In an interview with The Intercept, Matt Cagle, an attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, said “the portal blurs the line between corporate and government surveillance,” making it unclear where the Silicon Valley initiative ends and constitutional issues begin. With Ring marketing Neighbors as an attractive, brand-defining feature (“The Neighbors App is the new neighborhood watch that brings your community together to help create safer neighborhoods”), it’s not as if the company can treat this as some sort of little experimental pilot program. In response to a question about why the company doesn’t publicize the special enforcement portal on the Ring website, a spokesperson pointed to language on its website about how users can “get alerts from the Ring team and updates from local law enforcement, so you and your community can stay safe and in the know,” which makes no mention of the law enforcement portal or the access it permits. The spokesperson added that “Video Requests [from police] must include a case or incident number, a specific area of interest and must be confined to a specific time range and date” and that “users can choose to share some, none, or all of the videos, and can opt out of future requests.”

Even for those who’ve opted in to Neighbors, the power dynamics of receiving an unsolicited digital knock on the door from a local police officer muddies the nature of any consent a camera owner might provide through the portal, which Cagle believes gives law enforcement “coercive power over customers” by virtue of its design. “Many people are not going to feel like they have a choice when law enforcement asks for access to their footage,” said Cagle. Indeed, the auto-generated message shown in the Ring demo video contains essentially zero details about the request, beyond the fact that an officer is “investigating an incident that happened near you.” Imagine receiving a remote request from a police officer you’ve never met about a crime you know nothing about, all because you happened to buy a particular brand of doorbell and activated an app. Are you implicated in this “incident”? What happens if you refuse? Will you merely be a bad Ring Neighbor, or an uncooperative witness?

Consider as well the fact that Ring cameras are designed and sold to be placed not only outside you front door or garage, but inside your home too. What if a Ring owner provides footage from their camera to assist with a nearby “incident” that inadvertently reveals them smoking pot or violating their parole? When asked how people who live or pass by Ring cameras but are not Ring users can opt out of being recorded and having their image sent to police, the Ring spokesperson told The Intercept, “Our devices are not intended to be and should not be installed where the camera is recording someone else’s property without prior consent nor public areas.” It’s difficult if not impossible to reconcile this claim with the fact that Ring’s flagship product is a doorbell camera that points straight outward and captures anything or anyone who passes by a home’s entrance.

The video ends on an eerie note, adding that “in future versions we will also be enabling Ring’s smart search functionality that will allow for suspicious activity detection and person recognition.” What constitutes “suspicious activity” is anyone’s guess, as is how Ring will “detect” it. Given that the company still uses a team of clickers in the Ukraine to help tell the difference between cars and dogs, there’s little reason to have confidence in Ring’s ability to detect something worthy of suspicion, however it’s defined.

Even with the consent of owners, Cagle worries that the simple existence of a program like the Neighbors Portal threatens to blur, if not eliminate, the distinction between private-sector surveillance services and the government’s role as enforcer of the law. With regards to the latter, we have powerful constitutional safeguards, while with the former we have only terms of service and privacy policy agreements that no one reads. “Consent here is a smokescreen,” said Cagle. “Folks online consent to policies all the time without being meaningfully explained what is happening with our data, and the stakes are much higher here: Under guise of consent, this could invite needless surveillance of private lives.”

These possibilities don’t seem to have concerned Siminoff, whose giddiness about Ring’s future as a law enforcement asset is palpable throughout internal emails. Indeed, it’s clear that the anti-crime push wasn’t just an aspect of Ring according to its chief executive, but integral to its identity and fundamental to its company culture. In the March 2016 internal email, Siminoff added a special message to “the dirtbag criminals that steal our packages and rob our houses … your time is numbered because Ring is now officially declaring war on you!” In a November 2017 email announcing a third “Ring War” against alarm company ADT, Siminoff declared that Ring “will still become the largest security company in the world.” Another internal email from earlier in 2017 (subject: “Why We Are Here”) includes a message from Sgt. John Massi of the Philadelphia Police Department, thanking the company for its assistance with a recent string of thefts. “Wish I had some better wording for this,” wrote Siminoff, “but to put it bluntly, this is just FUCKING AWESOME!” In his message, Massi wrote that Ring’s “assistance allowed our detectives to secure an arrest & search warrant for our target, resulting in (7) counts of theft and related charges,” adding that the company “has demonstrated that they are a supportive partner in the fight against crime!”

The Intercept provided Ring with a list of detailed questions about the access it provides to police, but the company’s response left many of these unanswered. Ring did not address the consequences of bypassing the judicial system to obtain customer videos (albeit with consent), nor did the company answer how it defines or identifies “suspicious activity” or answer whether there are any guidelines in place regarding the handling or retention of customer videos by law enforcement. Without clear answers to these and other questions, Ring owners will simply have to trust Amazon and their local police to do the right thing.

The post Amazon’s Home Surveillance Chief Declared War on “Dirtbag Criminals” as Company Got Closer to Police appeared first on The Intercept.

IBM’s AI loses debate to human debating champion

IBM’s AI machine loses to a human in a debate competition

Last year, IBM, the global technology giant, had showcased an Artificial Intelligence (AI) machine that could argue, refute, debate and win against humans. Now, the very same IBM-made machine has lost out to a human champion debater from London.

For those unaware, IBM has a long list of major AI innovations, which also include “Deep Blue,” the IBM system that took on chess world champion Garry Kasparov in 1997, and IBM Watson, which beat the top human champions on Jeopardy! in 2011.

The AI system, Miss Debater (formerly known as Project Debater) was pitted against 31-year-old Harish Natarajan, a grand finalist at the 2016 World Debating Championships and 2012 European Debate Champion. The event was held in San Francisco’s Yerba Buena Center for the Arts on Monday, which was attended by as many as 700 spectators.

The topic of the debate was ‘whether or not preschools should be subsidized.’ The debate topic wasn’t revealed to the AI system or Natarajan until 15 minutes before they took to the stage. Project Debater argued in favor of subsidized preschool while Natarajan argued against it.

Both the parties had to deliver a four-minute opening statement, a four-minute rebuttal to the other’s argument, and a two-minute closing statement. The audience was asked to vote for either of the party at the start of the debate, and again at the end of the debate.

Before the debate, 79% of the audience agreed that preschool should be subsidized while 13% disagreed. The debate on pre-school subsidies lasted for 25 minutes. By the end of the debate, 62% of the crowd agreed and 30% disagreed. In this style of debate, the debater who is able to change the minds of the audience and gain most percentage points is declared the winner, and as a result, Natarajan was hailed the victor.

However, 58% also said that they felt Debater better enriched their knowledge about the issue, whereas Natarajan scored 20%.

Despite losing the challenge to Natarajan, the world-class debater was impressed with the fact that Debater could contextualize information and extract details from research. AI’s answers came from its database of 10 billion sentences taken from journal and newspaper articles.

“What really struck me is the potential value for Project Debater when synthesised with a human being, and the amount of knowledge that it is able to grasp,” said Natarajan after the debate.

“It was fascinating to listen to because I can see a lot of the potential it has, just in terms of the knowledge and its ability to contextualise that knowledge better than most human beings.”

Dr. Noam Slonim, one of two primary researchers behind Project Debater, added: “Ultimately, what we saw was that the interaction of man and machine could be enriching for both.

“It’s not a question of one being better than the other, but about AI and humans working together.”

You can check out the full debate video below.

The post IBM’s AI loses debate to human debating champion appeared first on TechWorm.

Kirsty McKinlay-Stewart on LinkedIn: “Delighted to introduce MASS, our new Key Network Partner. MASS provides world-class capabilities in Electronic Warfare Operational Support, Cyber Security, Information Management, Training Support and Digital Forensics. If you would like further information, use the link below. Mention CRJ when you call! Jess Smith BA (Hons) Stuart Gray FCMI Emily Hough David Stewart CMgr FCMI MAPM, PIOR, FSyI” - Delighted to introduce MASS, our new Key Network Partner. MASS provides world-class capabilities in Electronic Warfare Operational Support, Cyber Security, Information Management, Training Support an…

Tweeted by @KirstyCRJ

Is Your Marketing Ready For The Connected Consumer? | Schaefer Marketing Solutions: We Help Businesses {grow} - By Brooke B. Sellas, {grow} Contributing Columnist There’s a new connected consumer in town. And it’s time for you to get to know them. No, I’m not just talking about Gen Z … nor is this another post…

Tweeted by @JacqBiggar

Russia Plans To Disconnect From The Global Internet

The Russian government accompanied with major internet providers has planned to briefly disconnect the entire country from the global internet. This test will completely isolate the Russian internet aka Runet from the rest of the world.

The primary reason behind this internet shutdown is to test the security of Russian data. So here’s everything you need to know about the internet shutdown test in Russia.

ALSO READ: Here’s one way to make the Internet of Things a connected reality

Russia Plans To Disconnect From The Global Internet

For a limited period of time, the Russian government will completely disconnect Russia from the global internet. The Internet shutdown test in Russia will impact private citizens, power grids and even the military systems.

According to some reliable sources, the test will last for about 30 minutes and it will be conducted before 1st April. Every major Russian ISP will redirect all network traffic to nodes that are controlled by the Russian government.

This test will include the creation of an alternative domain name system (DNS) to protect the Russian-language section of the internet if in case it is disconnected from the World Wide Web.

The test will also help the Russian Government to gather insight and provide additional feedback and modifications to proposed laws.

Russian Internet Shutdown Test: Benefits

The Internet shutdown test will help the Russian government to monitor and completely abandon the websites containing banned information. In addition to that, the test will allow centralized control to all of the national internet traffic and also minimize the transfer of data to foreign servers.

Well, the Russian government carried out a drill back in mid-2014 to gather people’s response on the internet being disconnected from the web. The test will probably cost around 23 billion rubles or roughly $350 million.

Do share your thoughts and opinions on the internet shutdown test in Russia in the comments section below.

The post Russia Plans To Disconnect From The Global Internet appeared first on TechWorm.

The True Cost of Cyber-Warfare - Maintaining cybersecurity is a necessity because it goes beyond simple piracy to manipulation of the fabric of society. (Shutterstock) Cyber-warfare allows anyone to hack and take over billboards, te…

Tweeted by @AlBawabaBiz

LinkedIn to launch its own live video streaming service ‘LinkedIn Live’

LinkedIn debuts into live video broadcasting market with ‘LinkedIn Live’

Thanks to Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, live videos have become the biggest trend on the social web in recent times. As a result, LinkedIn, a business and employment-oriented service that operates via websites and mobile apps, has too decided to dive into the video livestreaming arena.

Apparently, the career website is testing a new live video streaming feature called ‘LinkedIn Live’ to broadcast live video streams, as first reported by TechCrunch. This new feature will allow numerous businesses and other users to conduct live proceedings such as conferences, earnings calls, awards ceremonies, mentor content, webinars, product launches, meetings, Q&A sessions, and more.

LinkedIn has also partnered with several third-party developers of live broadcasting streaming services to make video streaming easy. These third-party content creators include Wirecast, Switcher Studio, Wowza Media Systems, Socialive, and Brandlive, with more expected to be added in the future.

“Video is the fastest growing format on our platform right now, and the one most likely to get people talking,” TechCrunch was seen quoting Pete Davies, Linkedin’s Product Development Manager.

Currently, LinkedIn Live is available as an invite-only beta version in the U.S. and is accessible to limited users only. It is possible that after the test run in the U.S., the feature would be made available to users globally. However, there is no word from LinkedIn on the same.

Even though LinkedIn Live has arrived late into the live video streaming game, it has a lot of potential to catch up with other streaming services considering the unique position it holds in the market.

The post LinkedIn to launch its own live video streaming service ‘LinkedIn Live’ appeared first on TechWorm.

SN 701: Adiantum

  • Apple's most recent v12.1.4 iOS update and the two 0-day vulnerabilities it closed
  • Worrisome new Android image-display vulnerability
  • An interesting "reverse RDP" attack
  • The new LibreOffice & OpenOffice vulnerability
  • Microsoft's research into the primary source of software vulnerabilities
  • MaryJo gets an early peek at enterprise pricing for extending Windows 7 support
  • China and Russia continue their work to take control of their countries' Internet
  • Firefox's resumption of its A/V warning in release 65.
  • How Google does the Cha-Cha with their new "Adiantum" ultra-high-performance cryptographic cipher.

We invite you to read our show notes.

Hosts: Steve Gibson and Leo Laporte

Download or subscribe to this show at

You can submit a question to Security Now! at the GRC Feedback Page.

For 16kbps versions, transcripts, and notes (including fixes), visit Steve's site:, also the home of the best disk maintenance and recovery utility ever written Spinrite 6.


Russian to shut down Internet to test its cyber deterrence

By Carolina

To test the security of its data, Russia is considering disconnecting its Internet service for a short period of time. The test will affect all the data sent by Russian citizens or organizations as Internet access would be limited only within the national territory, meaning that they will not be routed internationally. The test has […]

This is a post from Read the original post: Russian to shut down Internet to test its cyber deterrence

Oliver Egrenius on LinkedIn: “”Russia is planning to temporarily cut off internet access throughout the entire country as it prepares for potential cyber warfare”. Talk about next level #cybersecurity. I don’t think our top #CISO delegates will go this far with security, but they will definitely talk about #cyberthreats and #cyberattacks and how to prevent it. Looking at how new technology can disrupt this area. If you are interested in meeting this #executives, then this is perfect for you. Check COMMENT for more Info! #informationsecurity #technology #AI #matchmaking “ - "Russia is planning to temporarily cut off internet access throughout the entire country as it prepares for potential cyber warfare". Talk about next level #cybersecurity. I don't think our top #CISO…

Tweeted by @oliveregrenius

Critical zero-day vulnerabilities hit Lifesize video conferencing products

By Waqas

The IT security researchers at TrustWave have discovered critical zero-day vulnerabilities in video conferencing products developed by Lifesize which, if exploited by attackers can cause a great deal of damage. Lifesize is an audio and video telecommunication firm based in the United States with offices in Africa, Europe, and the Middle East. Its products are used by […]

This is a post from Read the original post: Critical zero-day vulnerabilities hit Lifesize video conferencing products

Australia needs to do more to support women’s participation in efforts to counter violent extremism | The Strategist - On the first anniversary of the Chibok girls’ kidnapping, Nigerian activist Hamsatu Allamin told the UN Security Council that efforts to prevent violent extremism will not succeed without women’s par…

Tweeted by @ngowgwps

Khaled Fattal on LinkedIn: “Russia accepted that Geo-Poli-Cyber attacks and warfare are a real threat to its cyber-survivability as the MLi Group has been warning. To them this dramatic step of unplugging themselves from this internet maybe the only solution. Can your organization or nation state afford to unplug yourselves from the Internet as a way to mitigate its unprecendented threats? Of course not. Request your private briefing to learn why The MLi Group National Cyber-Survivability Strategies with Legislative Road Map for Nation States is the way forward today, and in the 21st century.” - Russia accepted that Geo-Poli-Cyber attacks and warfare are a real threat to its cyber-survivability as the MLi Group has been warning. To them this dramatic step of unplugging themselves from this i…

Tweeted by @kf_MLiGrp